In an interview with Invoice Press Supreme Court docket Justice Stephen Breyer got here out in favor of time period limits for Supreme Court docket Justices.
“I believe that if there have been a long run of years, I’m not talking about anyone’s proposal or concerning the political races or about politics or about candidates. And I’m really not saying something I haven’t stated many, many instances when there was no election within the offing. However I believe it could be advantageous to have lengthy phrases, say 18 years or one thing like that, for a Supreme Court docket Justice” Breyer stated.
PRESS: “Do you ever get reasonably lonely on the court docket, which means may you want just a few further members of the court docket? It has been proposed recently that we develop the variety of members on the court docket from 9 to 11 or 13. What do you consider that?”
BREYER: “I believe 9 is okay. I’m not talking about anyone’s proposal. However I’ve found that 9 appears to work, and the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court docket has seven. I’ve seen them at work, and I believe seven is a greater quantity. I imply, seven is okay. Eight is okay, 9 is okay. And it’s laborious, you already know, as a result of these usually are not shrinking violets, any of the members of the court docket.
And but they’ll be useful actually after they produce opinions which have greater than 5 or extra members signing on to these opinions. As a result of fundamental, the nation shouldn’t be — possibly just a few reporters are — however the nation shouldn’t be primarily in what Sandra O’Connor or what I or David or any individual else consider the Structure.
They wish to know primarily what does the court docket suppose? As a result of that’s what the legislation is, and that’s what they’ll need to comply with within the courts and thru authorized recommendation and within the nation typically. So it’s crucial to attempt to get these 5 on a single opinion.
So people who find themselves strong-minded , particular people, need to additionally on the identical time attempt to work collectively. And it really works pretty effectively. Not completely. However pretty effectively.”
PRESS: “As an alternative choice to increasing the court docket, others have recommended, together with a few of those that are operating for president in 2020, that we would take into account time period limits for members of the Supreme Court docket, which I imagine would require a constitutional modification. Your ideas?”
BREYER: “I believe that if there have been a long run of years, I’m not talking about anyone’s proposal or concerning the political races or about politics or about candidates. And I’m really not saying something I haven’t stated many, many instances when there was no election within the offing.
However I believe it could be advantageous to have lengthy phrases, say 18 years or one thing like that, for a Supreme Court docket Justice. It might make life simpler. You realize, I wouldn’t have to fret about after I’m going to retire or not.
And that might be simpler for me. And furthermore, it should be lengthy. And the explanation that it should be lengthy is since you don’t need any individual searching for his subsequent job after — whereas he’s a member of the court docket.”
Fb has significantly diminished the distribution of our tales in our readers’ newsfeeds and is as an alternative selling mainstream media sources. If you share to your pals, nonetheless, you significantly assist distribute our content material. Please take a second and take into account sharing this text together with your family and friends. Thanks.